Premium
Privatization of community corrections
Author(s) -
Latessa Edward J.,
Lovins Lori Brusman
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
criminology and public policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.6
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1745-9133
pISSN - 1538-6473
DOI - 10.1111/1745-9133.12433
Subject(s) - scrutiny , accountability , private sector , business , recidivism , public administration , public relations , economics , economic growth , political science , sociology , law , criminology
Research Summary In this article, we examine the issue of privatization in the field of community corrections. Privatization can be found in all elements of community corrections, including treatment, education, housing, and supervision services. The private sector is also involved in the development of technology, like electronic monitoring devices, and material like assessments and curricula. Services are provided by both private for‐profit and nonprofit agencies. Although there are potential harms and benefits to privatization in community corrections, untangling the private industry from the provision of supervision and programming in the community would be a true challenge. Policy Implications Implications for use of the private industry in community corrections include the need for oversight and accountability, with the expectation that private agencies provide evidence‐based services and demonstrate a reduction of recidivism through those services. Recognition that the private industry is meeting a need that might not easily be met by public agencies is also important. Privatization in community corrections has mainly dodged the public scrutiny seen against privatization of prisons; this could change depending on how far‐reaching privatization in community corrections becomes.