Premium
New conceptual framework for flood risk assessment in Sheffield, UK
Author(s) -
Chen IHui
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
geographical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.695
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1745-5871
pISSN - 1745-5863
DOI - 10.1111/1745-5871.12478
Subject(s) - flood myth , vulnerability (computing) , geography , geographic information system , flood risk assessment , resilience (materials science) , hazard , community resilience , 100 year flood , risk assessment , environmental resource management , risk analysis (engineering) , cartography , environmental science , computer science , business , ecology , physics , computer security , archaeology , redundancy (engineering) , thermodynamics , operating system , biology
This study explores a new framework of flood risk assessment that considers four components, namely hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and community resilience. The key variables and coefficients were selected using principal component analysis and geographically weighted regression (GWR) in a geographic information system (GIS). GWR was applied to present a spatial relation between flood risks and regeneration areas for dependent and independent variables in the four components. Then the new conceptual framework was overlaid as a flood risk map using risk indicators of the four components. The first three components were included in the GIS framework to map flood risk indices, whereas the community resilience component was subtracted from the total indices. Finally, the total number of indices of the flood risk map were divided into nine levels, from 0 to 8. Overall, the study shows the utility of the flood risk map, which is based on the spatial coincidence of mapping of the four components in a case study of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Areas with an index value of 8 on the flood risk map had the highest flood risks, which points to where there is a need for regeneration to improve flood defences and resilience.