Premium
International labour standards and decent work: a critical analysis of Thailand's experiences, with suggestions for theory, policy, practice and research
Author(s) -
Suttawet Chokchai,
Bamber Greg J
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
asia pacific journal of human resources
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.825
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1744-7941
pISSN - 1038-4111
DOI - 10.1111/1744-7941.12190
Subject(s) - work (physics) , agency (philosophy) , labour law , relevance (law) , human resources , capitalism , industrial relations , human resource management , democracy , politics , economics , business , labour economics , sociology , political science , management , law , social science , mechanical engineering , engineering
The International Labour Organization ( ILO ) promotes labour standards and decent work to counter a global ‘race to the bottom’ in terms of job regulation. By analysing Thailand's experiences, we consider three questions: 1) How might we characterize Thai capitalism?; 2) What are Thailand's labour market contexts for human resource management and industrial relations?; and 3) What is Thailand's situation regarding decent work and how is it related to politics, ILO labour standards and labour law? We identify two Thai labour‐market contexts: state‐owned and private enterprises where there is unionization (Type A); and public services/smaller enterprises/informal work where unionization is negligible (Type B). We find implementation of decent work is patchy. We suggest that Thailand reforms its tripartite agency to promote decent work and improve human resource management. These steps are more likely to be more effective and sustained under a parliamentary democracy than under a military junta. Our analysis has relevance also for other economies.