Premium
Telehealth practice in surgery: Ethical and medico‐legal considerations
Author(s) -
Lee Danny W. H.,
Tong KarWai,
Lai Paul B.S.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
surgical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.109
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1744-1633
pISSN - 1744-1625
DOI - 10.1111/1744-1633.12479
Subject(s) - telehealth , medicine , confidentiality , telemedicine , licensure , informed consent , jurisdiction , nursing , health care , alternative medicine , law , political science , pathology
There was rapid growth of telehealth practice during the COVID‐19 outbreak in 2020. In surgery, there were beneficial effects in terms of saving time and avoiding physical contact between healthcare professionals and patients when using telehealth in the delivery of perioperative care. As telehealth is gaining momentum, the evolving ethical and medico‐legal challenges arising from this alternative mode of doctor–patient interaction cannot be underestimated. With reference to the “Ethical Guidelines on Practice of Telemedicine” issued by the Medical Council of Hong Kong and some published court and disciplinary cases from other common law jurisdictions, this article discusses relevant ethical and medico‐legal issues in telehealth practice with emphasis on the following areas: duty of care; communication and contingency; patient‐centred care and informed consent; limitations and standard of care; keeping medical records, privacy, and confidentiality; and cross‐territory practice. Whilst existing ethical and legal obligations of practicing medicine are not changed when telehealth is used as opposed to in‐person care, telehealth practitioners are advised to familiarize themselves with the ethical guidelines, to keep abreast of the medico‐legal developments in this area, and to observe the licensure requirements and regulatory regimes of both the jurisdiction where they practice and where their patients are located.