Premium
Current airway management practices after a failed intubation attempt in Australian and New Zealand emergency departments
Author(s) -
Arnold Isaac,
Alkhouri Hatem,
Badge Helen,
Fogg Toby,
McCarthy Sally,
Vassiliadis John
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
emergency medicine australasia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.602
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1742-6723
pISSN - 1742-6731
DOI - 10.1111/1742-6723.13729
Subject(s) - medicine , intubation , laryngoscopy , airway management , odds ratio , confidence interval , emergency department , airway , specialty , emergency medicine , tracheal intubation , anesthesia , medical emergency , family medicine , nursing
Objective The aims of the present study were to describe current airway management practices after a failed intubation attempt in Australian and New Zealand EDs and to explore factors associated with second attempt success. Methods Data were collected from a multicentre airway registry (The Australian and New Zealand Emergency Department Airway Registry). All intubation episodes that required a second attempt between March 2010 and November 2015 were analysed. Analysis for association with success at the second attempt was undertaken for patient factors including predicted difficulty of laryngoscopy, as well as for changes in laryngoscope type, adjunct devices, intubator and intubating manoeuvres. Results Of the 762 patients with a failed first intubation attempt, 603 (79.1%) were intubated successfully at the second attempt. The majority of second attempts were undertaken by emergency consultants (36.8%) and emergency registrars (34.2%). A change in intubator occurred in 56.5% of intubation episodes and was associated with higher second attempt success (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29–2.65). In 69.7% of second attempts at intubation, there was no change in laryngoscope type. Changes in laryngoscope type, adjunct devices and intubation manoeuvres were not significantly associated with success at the second attempt. In adjusted analyses, second attempt success was higher for a change from a non‐consultant intubator to a consultant intubator from any specialty (adjusted OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.35–3.95) and where laryngoscopy was not predicted to be difficult (adjusted OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.58–4.21). Conclusions The majority of second intubation attempts were undertaken by emergency consultants and registrars. A change from a non‐consultant intubator to a consultant intubator of any specialty for the second attempt and intubation episodes where laryngoscopy was predicted to be non‐difficult were associated with a higher success rate at intubation. Participation in routine collection and monitoring of airway management practices via a Registry may enable the introduction of appropriate improvements in airway procedures and reduce complication rates.