Premium
Time to analgesia in an emergency department in Eastern Nepal
Author(s) -
Bhandari Rabin,
Malla Gyanendra,
Rai Bijendra Kumar,
Curry Chris
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
emergency medicine australasia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.602
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1742-6723
pISSN - 1742-6731
DOI - 10.1111/1742-6723.12623
Subject(s) - medicine , interquartile range , tramadol , triage , confidence interval , ketamine , emergency department , observational study , analgesic , prospective cohort study , morphine , anesthesia , emergency medicine , psychiatry
Objectives Nepal is a least developed country, with limited healthcare resources. An 18 month Fellowship in Emergency Medicine has contributed some improvements to care. This study assessed time to first analgesia in higher and lower acuity patients. Methods A prospective observational study of 101 patients in each of the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) 2, 3 and 100 in ATS 4 was undertaken at B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences. Convenience sampling was used coinciding with researcher's duty hours. Pain scores and time to analgesia were recorded. Results A total of 302 patients were included. The doctors identified pain in 274 (90%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 86.74–93.65), severity recorded in 92 (30.5%, 95% CI 25–36). Median time from triage to analgesia was 30 min (interquartile range [IQR] 15–60) for ATS 2 patients, 60 min (IQR 40–70) for ATS 3 and 69 min (IQR 45–116) for ATS 4. Tramadol was the analgesic used most commonly (33%), followed by diclofenac (25%), morphine (16%), paracetamol (14%) and ketamine (2%). Analgesia was provided to 212 (70%, 95% CI 64.6–75.2), 65 (30.66%, 95% CI 24.5–37.3) with ATS 2, 85 (40%, 95% CI 33.4–47) with ATS 3 and 62 (29.2%, 95% CI 23.2–35.8) with ATS 4. A total of 44 patients (20.7%, 95% CI 15.5–26.8) with mild, 101 (47.6%, 95% CI 40.7–54.6) with moderate and 60 (28.3%, 95% CI 22.3–34.8) with severe pain received analgesics. Conclusion Time to analgesia for triage score 2 is lower compared to higher triage score. However, a large proportion of patients still do not receive analgesia. This is likely addressed by using a combination of strategies.