Premium
Photogrammetry vs CT Scan: Evaluation of Accuracy of a Low‐Cost Three‐Dimensional Acquisition Method for Forensic Facial Approximation
Author(s) -
Donato Laura,
Cecchi Rossana,
Goldoni Matteo,
Ubelaker Douglas H.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of forensic sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.715
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1556-4029
pISSN - 0022-1198
DOI - 10.1111/1556-4029.14319
Subject(s) - photogrammetry , skull , artificial intelligence , computer vision , software , computer science , 3d reconstruction , medicine , anatomy , programming language
Photogrammetry is a three‐dimensional acquisition method potentially applicable to the forensic field. This possibility requires the verification of its accuracy. In this study, 3D volumes of skulls are generated to compare the photogrammetry versus the CT scan. In order to provide eligible material to the photogrammetric software, photographs were captured at a distance of 30 cm from the skull placed on a support 1 m in height and illuminated with diffused laboratory ceiling artificial light. A Nikon Coolpix P7100 camera was used. Photographs capture common elements with the previous and the next photograph so as to allow the photogrammetric software to recognize these common points between photographs and create a 3D puzzle. The Zephyr Lite (3DFlow©) software was employed to register the 3D volume. CT‐based skulls are taken as a metric reference. The photogrammetry‐based skulls are then enlarged according to the measurements of some landmarks or Zygion and Zygion, the distance between end of nasal and base of nasal pyramid for frontal projection, and minimum breadth of the mandibular ramus for the right lateral projection. The accuracy of the photogrammetry is compared to that of the CT scan by measuring the 3D volumes of the skulls studied. Specific landmarks are used as reference points for the measures in both frontal and lateral views. Bland–Altman graph shows homogeneity. The mean difference (1.28 mm) indicates that the measurements taken on the photogrammetry‐based skull tend to slightly overestimate compared with the measurements taken on the CT‐based skull.