z-logo
Premium
The Effect of Household Oxidizing Cleaners on Chemiluminescence of Blood Using Bluestar ®
Author(s) -
Adams Joshua L.,
Rancourt Emily D.,
Christensen Angi M.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of forensic sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.715
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1556-4029
pISSN - 0022-1198
DOI - 10.1111/1556-4029.13914
Subject(s) - tile , chemiluminescence , oxidizing agent , ceramic tiles , chemistry , waste management , medicine , materials science , chromatography , composite material , engineering , organic chemistry
Abstract This study tests the effect of three common oxidizing cleaners on the ability of the Bluestar Forensic® presumptive test for blood to identify the presence of blood on ceramic tile after cleaning. The cleaners tested were Lysol®, OxiClean®, and Arm & Hammer®. This study also tested which cleaner was the most effective at removing blood, measured by the intensity of chemiluminescence, which was quantified using RGB values in ImageJ. A “hasty” 1‐min cleaning of a blood droplet was simulated using the three cleaners. The chemiluminescence of the Bluestar® reactions after cleaning the blood‐treated region was compared to an untreated region of the same tile for each cleaner, as well as to the treated regions of tiles between the three cleaners. Results indicate that none of the three cleaners removed all of the blood (all p  <   0.001) and that Lysol® removed more blood compared to the OxiClean® and Arm & Hammer®.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here