Premium
Accuracy and Reliability of the Klales et al. (2012) Morphoscopic Pelvic Sexing Method
Author(s) -
Lesciotto Kate M.,
Doershuk Lily J.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of forensic sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.715
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1556-4029
pISSN - 0022-1198
DOI - 10.1111/1556-4029.13501
Subject(s) - sexing , intraclass correlation , statistics , kappa , reliability (semiconductor) , trait , forensic anthropology , mathematics , reproducibility , computer science , biology , genetics , geography , power (physics) , geometry , physics , archaeology , quantum mechanics , programming language
Klales et al. (2012) devised an ordinal scoring system for the morphoscopic pelvic traits described by Phenice (1969) and used for sex estimation of skeletal remains. The aim of this study was to test the accuracy and reliability of the Klales method using a large sample from the Hamann‐Todd collection ( n = 279). Two observers were blinded to sex, ancestry, and age and used the Klales et al. method to estimate the sex of each individual. Sex was correctly estimated for females with over 95% accuracy; however, the male allocation accuracy was approximately 50%. Weighted Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient analysis for evaluating intra‐ and interobserver error showed moderate to substantial agreement for all traits. Although each trait can be reliably scored using the Klales method, low accuracy rates and high sex bias indicate better trait descriptions and visual guides are necessary to more accurately reflect the range of morphological variation.