Premium
Analysis of Ecstasy Tablets Using Capillary Electrophoresis with Capacitively Coupled Contactless Conductivity Detection
Author(s) -
Porto Suely K. S. S.,
Nogueira Thiago,
Blanes Lucas,
Doble Philip,
Sabino Bruno D.,
Lago Claudimir L.,
Angnes Lúcio
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of forensic sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.715
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1556-4029
pISSN - 0022-1198
DOI - 10.1111/1556-4029.12573
Subject(s) - ecstasy , chromatography , capillary electrophoresis , designer drug , chemistry , mdma , derivatization , analytical chemistry (journal) , mass spectrometry , pharmacology , medicine , drug , psychiatry
A method for the identification of 3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine ( MDMA ) and meta‐chlorophenylpiperazine ( mCPP ) was developed employing capillary electrophoresis ( CE ) with capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection (C 4 D). Sample extraction, separation, and detection of “ Ecstasy” tablets were performed in <10 min without sample derivatization. The separation electrolyte was 20 m m TAPS /Lithium, pH 8.7. Average minimal detectable amounts for MDMA and mCPP were 0.04 mg/tablet, several orders of magnitude lower than the minimum amount encountered in a tablet. Seven different Ecstasy tablets seized in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, were analyzed by CE ‐C 4 D and compared against routine gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry ( GC ‐ MS ). The CE method demonstrated sufficient selectivity to discriminate the two target drugs, MDMA and mCPP , from the other drugs present in seizures, namely amphepramone, fenproporex, caffeine, lidocaine, and cocaine. Separation was performed in <90 sec. The advantages of using C 4 D instead of traditional CE ‐ UV methods for in‐field analysis are also discussed.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom