Premium
Does the Prior Application of the Field Kit Bullet Hole Testing Kit 3 on a Suspected Bullet Hole Bias the Analysis of Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry?
Author(s) -
Seltenhammer Monika H.,
Fitzl Christine,
Wieser Ingo,
Binder Reinhard,
Paula Pia,
Risser Daniele U.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of forensic sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.715
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1556-4029
pISSN - 0022-1198
DOI - 10.1111/1556-4029.12530
Subject(s) - bruton's tyrosine kinase , atomic absorption spectroscopy , analytical chemistry (journal) , chemistry , medicine , chromatography , physics , receptor , quantum mechanics , tyrosine kinase
Forensic ballistics is the study of bullet trajectory and consists of determining gunshot residue ( GSR ) to identify bullet holes. Among several highly sensitive methods, atomic absorption spectrophotometry ( AAS ) is employed to analyze GSR in the laboratory. However, it is sometimes necessary to identify bullet holes immediately at a crime scene. The purpose of this examination was to determine whether the use of the field test Bullet Hole Testing Kit 3 ( BTK 3) on a suspected bullet hole would influence the outcome of AAS ‐analysis: Three commonly encountered firearms ( G lock17, T okarev, and C olt) were fired at skin, wood, and cloth. AAS ‐analysis was performed with and without previous BTK 3 application. The results clearly indicate that there is no significant interaction on the grounds of BTK 3 use ( BTK 3 vs . no‐ BTK 3 [kit_nokit] [ P b: p = 0.1309; S b: p = 0.9111], material*kit_nokit [ P b: p = 0.5960; S b: p = 0.9930], distance*kit_nokit [ P b: p = 0.4014; S b: p = 0.9184], and firearm type*kit_nokit [ P b: p = 0.9662; S b: p = 0.9885]); hence, applying this field kit does not falsify later AAS outcomes.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom