z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society?
Author(s) -
Habermas Jürgen
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of chinese philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.1
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 1540-6253
pISSN - 0301-8121
DOI - 10.1111/1540-6253.12074
Subject(s) - politics , constitution , league , order (exchange) , political science , section (typography) , wish , the republic , environmental ethics , sociology , law , epistemology , philosophy , economics , anthropology , finance , astronomy , advertising , physics , business
The chances of the project of a “cosmopolitan order” being successful are not worse now than they were in 1945 or in 1989–1990. This does not mean that the chances are good, but we should not lose sight of the scale of things. The Kantian project first became part of the political agenda with the League of Nations, in other words after more than 200 years; and the idea of a cosmopolitan order first received a lasting embodiment with the foundation of the United Nations (UN). This process points toward a continuation of the Kantian project. We can still take our cue from Kant's idea of a cosmopolitan condition if we simply construe it in sufficiently abstract terms. I wish to show first of all why I consider the Kantian alternative between a world of republic and a league of nations to be incomplete (section I) and will then go on to outline how we can reconceptualize the Kantian project under contemporary conditions (section II). And I shall close by addressing an actual challenge to which that project might well offer the most promising response (section III).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom