Premium
Commuting with Lost Housing Services as the Opportunity Cost
Author(s) -
Williams Joseph
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
real estate economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.064
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1540-6229
pISSN - 1080-8620
DOI - 10.1111/1540-6229.12091
Subject(s) - metropolitan area , downtown , wage , work (physics) , demographic economics , economics , labour economics , journey to work , geography , mechanical engineering , public transport , archaeology , political science , law , engineering
In American metropolitan areas, households are highly mixed by income with higher average incomes at greater distances from downtown. Also, suburbs attract families with children, while poor households and small households with young heads select sites close to the commercial core. These empirical observations and others are predicted by this standard model of a monocentric city with three major modifications. Time at work is controlled by employers, not employees. Households with more members at home consume in the same house more housing services. Finally, lot prices need not be proportional to area. In the resulting equilibrium, households are mixed by income and separated by family size. This contrasts with classic urban models where households are separated only by their workers' wage rates.