z-logo
Premium
The Effect of Alternative Return Measures on Restricted Mixed‐Asset Portfolios
Author(s) -
Webb James R.,
Rubens Jack H.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
real estate economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.064
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1540-6229
pISSN - 1080-8620
DOI - 10.1111/1540-6229.00450
Subject(s) - real estate , capitalization rate , economics , bond , econometrics , portfolio , rate of return , capitalization , financial economics , asset (computer security) , risk–return spectrum , real estate investment trust , actuarial science , finance , linguistics , philosophy , computer security , computer science
A restricted portfolio is constructed which includes NYSE common stocks, corporate bonds, government bonds, small capitalization common stocks, residential real estate and farmland and returns for each of four different tax brackets (0%, 15%, 30%, 45%). Next, three alternative measures of rates of return for residential real estate and farmland are used. Finally, since some researchers believe that standard risk measures (variance and standard deviation) do not capture the total risk in real estate, the risk for the real estate returns is increased five times while the returns are held constant. The twenty–four optimal portfolios (four tax brackets with two measures of risk and three measure of return for residential real estate and farmland) are then derived. These results are then compared and contrasted to each other to ascertain the change in sensitivity of the optimal portfolios due to different tax rates, different rates–of–return estimates and different risk estimates.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here