z-logo
Premium
Are Local and Organic Claims Complements or Substitutes? A Consumer Preferences Study for Eggs
Author(s) -
Gracia Azucena,
BarreiroHurlé Jesús,
Galán Belinda López
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of agricultural economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.157
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1477-9552
pISSN - 0021-857X
DOI - 10.1111/1477-9552.12036
Subject(s) - production (economics) , preference , product (mathematics) , organic product , price premium , economics , business , consumer demand , food products , marketing , microeconomics , willingness to pay , mathematics , ecology , chemistry , geometry , food science , biology , agriculture
This paper provides an analysis of consumer preferences for product claims, specifically about origin and production methods. In particular, it addresses two important questions: i) whether consumers are willing to pay a premium for food products carrying these claims; and ii) whether local and organic claims are complements or substitutes. A choice experiment designed to estimate two‐way interactions was undertaken in Spain for eggs. The findings show first, that consumers are willing to pay a positive premium price for an enhanced method of production (that of barn, free‐range and/or organic instead of cage produced eggs) as well as for the proximity of production (local, regional and national over imported). Second, the findings show that consumer preferences for the claims are heterogeneous with two consumer segments being identified: “origin preference”, the larger segment, and the “production method preference”. Results show that organic and local claims were complements for the larger first segment but that free‐range and local/regional claims were substitutes for the second smaller segment. These results provide the marketing chains with insights applicable for pricing strategies.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here