Premium
Tick Size and Financial Reporting Quality in Small‐Cap Firms: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Author(s) -
AHMED ANWER S.,
LI YIWEN,
XU NINA
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of accounting research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.767
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1475-679X
pISSN - 0021-8456
DOI - 10.1111/1475-679x.12331
Subject(s) - accrual , natural experiment , tick size , incentive , scrutiny , business , quality (philosophy) , difference in differences , finance , accounting , monetary economics , economics , earnings , econometrics , microeconomics , philosophy , statistics , mathematics , epistemology , market liquidity , political science , law
Using a natural experiment (the SEC's 2016 Tick Size Pilot Program), we investigate the effects of an increase in tick size on financial reporting quality. The tick size pilot program reduces algorithmic trading (AT) and increases fundamental investors’ information acquisition and trading activities. This in turn increases the scrutiny of managers’ financial reporting choices and reduces their incentives to engage in misreporting. Using a difference‐in‐differences research design, we find a significant decrease in the magnitude of discretionary accruals, a significant reduction in the likelihood of just meeting or beating analysts’ forecasts, and a marginally significant decrease in restatements for the treated firms in the pilot program. Furthermore, we find that the change in financial reporting quality is concentrated in treated firms experiencing decreases in AT and increases in information acquisition activities. We also find that the mispricing of accruals is significantly lower for treated firms. Taken together, our results suggest that an increase in tick size has a causal effect on firms’ financial reporting quality.