Premium
Physician practices in Accountable Care Organizations are more likely to collect and use physician performance information, yet base only a small proportion of compensation on performance data
Author(s) -
Rosenthal Meredith,
Shortell Stephen,
Shah Nilay D.,
Peiris David,
Lewis Valerie A.,
Barrera Jacob A.,
Usadi Benjamin,
Colla Carrie H.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
health services research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.706
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1475-6773
pISSN - 0017-9124
DOI - 10.1111/1475-6773.13238
Subject(s) - pay for performance , descriptive statistics , compensation (psychology) , quality (philosophy) , quality management , best practice , logistic regression , payment , health care , medicine , survey data collection , family medicine , business , psychology , marketing , finance , philosophy , statistics , mathematics , management , epistemology , service (business) , psychoanalysis , economics , economic growth
Importance It is critical to develop a better understanding of the strategies provider organizations use to improve the performance of frontline clinicians and whether ACO participation is associated with differential adoption of these tools. Objectives Characterize the strategies that physician practices use to improve clinician performance and determine their association with ACOs and other payment reforms. Data Sources The National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and the National Survey of ACOs fielded 2017‐2018 (response rates = 47 percent and 48 percent). Study Design Descriptive analysis for practices participating and not participating in ACOs among 2190 physician practice respondents. Linear regressions to examine characteristics associated with counts of performance domains for which a practice used data for feedback, quality improvement, or physician compensation as dependent variables. Logistic and fractional regression to examine characteristics associated with use of peer comparison and shares of primary care and specialist compensation accounted for by performance bonuses, respectively. Principal Findings ACO‐affiliated practices feed back clinician‐level information and use it for quality improvement and compensation on more performance domains than non‐ACO‐affiliated practices. Performance measures contribute little to physician compensation irrespective of ACO participation. Conclusion ACO‐affiliated practices are using more performance improvement strategies than other practices, but base only a small fraction of compensation on quality or cost.