Premium
Imputation of race/ethnicity to enable measurement of HEDIS performance by race/ethnicity
Author(s) -
Haas Ann,
Elliott Marc N.,
Dembosky Jacob W.,
Adams John L.,
WilsonFrederick Shondelle M.,
Mallett Joshua S.,
Gaillot Sarah,
Haffer Samuel C.,
Haviland Amelia M.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
health services research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.706
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1475-6773
pISSN - 0017-9124
DOI - 10.1111/1475-6773.13099
Subject(s) - ethnic group , pacific islanders , medicaid , race (biology) , medicine , demography , geocoding , census , imputation (statistics) , health equity , observational study , gerontology , missing data , geography , population , statistics , public health , environmental health , health care , sociology , cartography , political science , mathematics , gender studies , nursing , anthropology , law
Objective To improve an existing method, Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding ( MBISG ) 1.0 that augments the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ ( CMS ) administrative measure of race/ethnicity with surname and geographic data to estimate race/ethnicity. Data Sources/Study Setting Data from 284 627 respondents to the 2014 Medicare CAHPS survey. Study Design We compared performance (cross‐validated Pearson correlation of estimates and self‐reported race/ethnicity) for several alternative models predicting self‐reported race/ethnicity in cross‐sectional observational data to assess accuracy of estimates, resulting in MBISG 2.0. MBISG 2.0 adds to MBISG 1.0 first name, demographic, and coverage predictors of race/ethnicity and uses a more flexible data aggregation framework. Data Collection/Extraction Methods We linked survey‐reported race/ethnicity to CMS administrative and US census data. Principal Findings MBISG 2.0 removed 25‐39 percent of the remaining MBISG 1.0 error for Hispanics, Whites, and Asian/Pacific Islanders ( API ), and 9 percent for Blacks, resulting in correlations of 0.88 to 0.95 with self‐reported race/ethnicity for these groups. Conclusions MBISG 2.0 represents a substantial improvement over MBISG 1.0 and the use of CMS administrative data on race/ethnicity alone. MBISG 2.0 is used in CMS ’ public reporting of Medicare Advantage contract HEDIS measures stratified by race/ethnicity for Hispanics, Whites, API , and Blacks.