Premium
Improving Hospital Performance Rankings Using Discrete Patient Diagnoses for Risk Adjustment of Outcomes
Author(s) -
DeCenso Brendan,
Duber Herbert C.,
Flaxman Abraham D.,
Murphy Shane M.,
Hanlon Michael
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
health services research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.706
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1475-6773
pISSN - 0017-9124
DOI - 10.1111/1475-6773.12683
Subject(s) - medical diagnosis , comorbidity , medicaid , medicine , ranking (information retrieval) , diagnosis code , univariate , emergency medicine , health care , statistics , multivariate statistics , machine learning , computer science , population , environmental health , pathology , economics , economic growth , mathematics
Objective To assess the changes in patient outcome prediction and hospital performance ranking when incorporating diagnoses as risk adjusters rather than comorbidity indices. Data Sources Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases for New York State, 2005–2009. Study Design Conducted tree‐based classification for mortality and readmission by incorporating discrete patient diagnoses as predictors, comparing with traditional comorbidity indices such as those used for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ( CMS ) outcome models. Principal Findings Diagnosis codes as predictors increased predictive accuracy 5.6 percent (95% CI : 4.5–6.9 percent) relative to CMS condition categories for heart failure 30‐day mortality. Most other outcomes exhibited statistically significant accuracy gains and facility ranking shifts. Sensitivity analysis showed improvements even when predictors were limited to only the diagnoses included in CMS models. Conclusions Discretizing patient severity information beyond the levels of traditional comorbidity indices improves patient outcome predictions and substantially shifts facility rankings.