Premium
Patient‐Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population‐Based Survey of U.S. Women
Author(s) -
Jou Judy,
Kozhimannil Katy B.,
Johnson Pamela Jo,
Sakala Carol
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
health services research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.706
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1475-6773
pISSN - 0017-9124
DOI - 10.1111/1475-6773.12231
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , confidence interval , odds , cesarean delivery , labor induction , logistic regression , induction of labor , obstetrics , pregnancy , population , multivariate analysis , environmental health , biology , oxytocin , genetics
Objective To determine whether patient‐perceived pressure from clinicians for labor induction or cesarean delivery is significantly associated with having these procedures. Data Sources/Study Setting Listening to Mothers III , a nationally representative survey of women 18–45 years who delivered a singleton infant in a U.S. hospital July 2011–June 2012 ( N = 2,400). Study Design Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with perceived pressure and estimation of odds of induction and cesarean given perceived pressure. Principal Findings Overall, 14.8 percent of respondents perceived pressure from a clinician for labor induction and 13.3 percent for cesarean delivery. Women who perceived pressure for labor induction had higher odds of induction overall (adjusted odds ratio [a OR ]: 3.51; 95 percent confidence interval [ CI ]: 2.5–5.0) and without medical reason (a OR : 2.13; 95 percent CI : 1.3–3.4) compared with women who did not perceive pressure. Those perceiving pressure for cesarean delivery had higher odds of cesarean overall (a OR : 5.17; 95 percent CI : 3.2–8.4), without medical reason (a OR : 6.13; 95 percent CI : 3.4–11.1), and unplanned cesarean (a OR : 6.70; 95 percent CI : 4.0–11.3). Conclusions Patient‐perceived pressure from clinicians significantly predicts labor induction and cesarean delivery. Efforts to reduce provider–patient miscommunication and minimize potentially unnecessary procedures may be warranted.