Premium
Methods for Constructing and Assessing Propensity Scores
Author(s) -
Garrido Melissa M.,
Kelley Amy S.,
Paris Julia,
Roza Katherine,
Meier Diane E.,
Morrison R. Sean,
Aldridge Melissa D.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
health services research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.706
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1475-6773
pISSN - 0017-9124
DOI - 10.1111/1475-6773.12182
Subject(s) - propensity score matching , covariate , observational study , weighting , matching (statistics) , medicine , comparative effectiveness research , statistics , mathematics , radiology , alternative medicine , pathology
Objectives To model the steps involved in preparing for and carrying out propensity score analyses by providing step‐by‐step guidance and Stata code applied to an empirical dataset. Study Design Guidance, Stata code, and empirical examples are given to illustrate (1) the process of choosing variables to include in the propensity score; (2) balance of propensity score across treatment and comparison groups; (3) balance of covariates across treatment and comparison groups within blocks of the propensity score; (4) choice of matching and weighting strategies; (5) balance of covariates after matching or weighting the sample; and (6) interpretation of treatment effect estimates. Empirical Application We use data from the Palliative Care for Cancer Patients (PC4C) study, a multisite observational study of the effect of inpatient palliative care on patient health outcomes and health services use, to illustrate the development and use of a propensity score. Conclusions Propensity scores are one useful tool for accounting for observed differences between treated and comparison groups. Careful testing of propensity scores is required before using them to estimate treatment effects.