Premium
Portfolio allocation patterns and policy‐making effectiveness in minority coalition governments
Author(s) -
KÖNIG THOMAS,
LIN NICK
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
european journal of political research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.267
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1475-6765
pISSN - 0304-4130
DOI - 10.1111/1475-6765.12416
Subject(s) - scrutiny , parliament , opposition (politics) , multi party system , coalition government , argument (complex analysis) , government (linguistics) , corporate governance , public administration , negotiation , portfolio , political science , economics , public economics , political economy , politics , law , finance , democracy , chemistry , linguistics , philosophy , biochemistry
Although minority coalition has become a relatively frequent form of governance, it is often considered politically ineffective in policy making. To obtain sufficient support in parliament, government bills must go through the scrutiny activities initiated by coalition partners and overcome the concerns of external support parties in opposition. By examining parliamentary scrutiny on government bills, this paper explains the surprising policy‐making effectiveness in minority coalition governments. Specifically, we argue and show that different patterns of portfolio allocation with the specific ideological locations of the ministerial office‐holder, the coalition partner and the external supporter, structure the extent to which government bills are scrutinized in parliament, and therefore, the effectiveness of the minority coalition on managing and implementing policies. We empirically examine bills initiated by 256 ministries in 13 Danish minority coalitions between 1985 and 2015, and we reveal robust evidence that corroborates our argument.