z-logo
Premium
On prediction in political science
Author(s) -
DOWDING KEITH,
MILLER CHARLES
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
european journal of political research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.267
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1475-6765
pISSN - 0304-4130
DOI - 10.1111/1475-6765.12319
Subject(s) - disappointment , politics , scale (ratio) , positive economics , epistemology , sociology , political science , psychology , economics , social psychology , law , philosophy , physics , quantum mechanics
Abstract This article discusses recent moves in political science that emphasise predicting future events rather than theoretically explaining past ones or understanding empirical generalisations. Two types of prediction are defined: pragmatic, and scientific. The main aim of political science is explanation, which requires scientific prediction. Scientific prediction does not necessarily entail pragmatic prediction nor does it necessarily refer to the future, though both are desiderata for political science. Pragmatic prediction is not necessarily explanatory, and emphasising pragmatic prediction will lead to disappointment, as it will not always help in understanding how to intervene to change future outcomes, and policy makers are likely to be disappointed by its time‐scale.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here