Premium
Killing in the Name of Islam: Al‐Qaeda's Justification for September 11
Author(s) -
Wiktorowicz Quintan,
Kaltner John
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
middle east policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.177
H-Index - 27
eISSN - 1475-4967
pISSN - 1061-1924
DOI - 10.1111/1475-4967.00107
Subject(s) - memphis , islam , al qaeda , citation , political science , media studies , theology , history , sociology , law , philosophy , terrorism , botany , biology
In the wake of the September 11 attacks, President Bush moved quickly to dismiss al-Qaeda operatives as part of the lunatic fringe, religious usurpers bent on misrepresenting and “hijacking” Islam to serve terrorism.1 This characterization was echoed in the Muslim world, where an assortment of government officials, religious scholars and opposition figures fervidly denounced the killing of civilians as un-Islamic.2 Abdulaziz bin Abdullah al-Ashaykh, the mufti of Saudi Arabia, argued that “hijacking planes, terrorizing innocent people and shedding blood constitute a form of injustice that cannot be tolerated by Islam, which views them as gross crimes and sinful acts.”3 Muhammed Sayyid alTantawi, the rector of al-Azhar University in Cairo, issued a similar condemnation: “Attacking innocent people is not courageous, it is stupid and will be punished on the day of judgment. . . . It’s not courageous to attack innocent children, women and civilians. It is courageous to protect freedom, it is courageous to defend oneself and not to attack.”4 Shaikh Yussuf alQaradawi, a prominent Islamic scholar and television personality from Qatar, emphasized that “Islam, the religion of tolerance, holds the human soul in high esteem, and considers the attack against innocent human beings a grave sin.”5 Even Islamic fundamentalist groups issued sharp denunciations. Forty-six leaders representing an assortment of Islamist movements and groups signed a letter opposed to the attacks: