Premium
Impact of the size of the lesion in prenatal neural tube defect repair on imaging, neurosurgical and motor outcomes: a retrospective cohort study
Author(s) -
Corroenne R,
Zhu KH,
Johnson E,
Johnson R,
Whitehead WE,
Espinoza J,
Castillo J,
Castillo H,
Orman G,
Huisman TAGM,
MehollinRay AR,
Shamshirsaz AA,
Nassr AA,
Belfort MA,
Sanz Cortes M
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/1471-0528.16316
Subject(s) - medicine , lesion , ventriculomegaly , retrospective cohort study , surgery , hydrocephalus , odds ratio , cohort , dehiscence , fetal surgery , pregnancy , fetus , in utero , biology , genetics
Objectives (1) To compare brain findings between large and non‐large neural tube defect (NTD); (2) to evaluate the impact of large lesion on the surgical parameters; (3) to study any associations between the size of the lesions and brain findings 6 weeks postoperatively and neurological short‐term outcomes. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Texas Children’s Hospital, between 2011 and 2018. Population Patients who underwent prenatal NTD repair. Methods Large lesion was defined when the lesion’s surface was >75th centile of our cohorts’ lesions. Main outcome measures Time of referral: ventriculomegaly and anatomical level of the lesion; surgery: duration and need for relaxing incisions. 6 weeks postoperative: hindbrain herniation (HBH) and ventriculomegaly. After delivery: dehiscence, need for hydrocephalus treatment and motor function. Results A total of 99 patients were included, 25 of whom presented with large lesions. Type of lesion and ventriculomegaly were comparable between individuals with large and non‐large lesions. Individuals with large lesions were associated with increased need for relaxing incisions by 5.4 times (95% CI 1.3–23.2, P = 0.02). Six weeks postoperatively, having a large lesion decreased by ten times the likelihood of having a postoperative reversal of HBH (odds ratio = 0.1, 95% CI 0.1–0.4, P < 0.01). At birth, larger lesions increased the risk for repair dehiscence by 6.1 times (95% CI 1.6–22.5, P < 0.01) and the risk of dehiscence or leakage of cerebrospinal fluid at birth by 5.5 times (95% CI 1.6–18.9, P < 0.01). Conclusion Prenatal repair of patients with large NTD presents a lower proportion of HBH reversal 6 weeks after the surgery, a higher risk of dehiscence and a higher need for postnatal repair. Tweetable abstract Evaluation of the size of fetal NTD can predict adverse neurological outcomes after prenatal NTD repair.