Premium
Obstetrical providers’ preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non‐medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross‐sectional study
Author(s) -
Rivo JC,
Amyx M,
Pingray V,
Casale RA,
Fiorillo AE,
Krupitzki HB,
Malamud JD,
Mendilaharzu M,
Medina ML,
Pino AB,
Ribola L,
Schvartzman JA,
Tartalo GM,
Trasmonte M,
Varela S,
Althabe F,
Belizán JM
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/1471-0528.15122
Subject(s) - caesarean section , medicine , cross sectional study , obstetrics and gynaecology , vaginal delivery , family medicine , obstetrics , population , odds ratio , pregnancy , genetics , pathology , biology , environmental health
Objective To describe obstetrical providers’ delivery preferences and attitudes towards caesarean section without medical indication, including on maternal request, and to examine the association between provider characteristics and preferences/attitudes. Design Cross‐sectional study. Setting Two public and two private hospitals in Argentina. Population Obstetrician‐gynaecologists and midwives who provide prenatal care and/or labour/delivery services. Methods Providers in hospitals with at least 1000 births per year completed a self‐administered, anonymous survey. Main outcome measures Provider delivery preference for low‐risk women, perception of women's preferred delivery method, support for a woman's right to choose her delivery method and willingness to perform caesarean section on maternal request. Results 168 providers participated (89.8% coverage rate). Providers (93.2%) preferred a vaginal delivery for their patients in the absence of a medical indication for caesarean section. Whereas 74.4% of providers supported their patient's right to choose a delivery method in the absence of a medical indication for caesarean section and 66.7% would perform a caesarean section upon maternal request, only 30.4% would consider a non‐medically indicated caesarean section for their own personal delivery or that of their partner. In multivariate adjusted analysis, providers in the private sector [odds ratio ( OR ) 4.70, 95% CI 1.19–18.62] and obstetrician‐gynaecologists ( OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.58–12.09) were more willing than either providers working in the public/both settings or midwives to perform a caesarean section on maternal request. Conclusions Despite the ethical debate surrounding non‐medically indicated caesarean sections, we observe very high levels of support, especially by providers in the private sector and obstetrician‐gynaecologists, as aligned with the high caesarean section rates in Argentina. Tweetable abstract Non‐medically indicated c‐section? 74% of sampled Argentine OB providers support women's right to choose