Premium
Comparison of management regimens following ultrasound diagnosis of nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
Author(s) -
Ramkrishna J,
Kan GR,
Reidy KL,
Ang WC,
PalmaDias R
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/1471-0528.14752
Subject(s) - medicine , ectopic pregnancy , methotrexate , retrospective cohort study , surgery , cohort , regimen , obstetrics , pregnancy , genetics , biology
Objective To review management options for nontubal ectopic pregnancies. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Population A total of 100 nontubal pregnancies: 1 abdominal, 32 caesarean scar, 14 cervical, 41 cornual–interstitial, 12 ovarian. Methods Cases were classified according to ectopic site. Management categories were medical, surgical, combination or expectant. Use of minimally invasive approaches (ultrasound‐guided intra‐sac injections or selective surgical techniques) was identified. Primary management was considered to be successful if no further unplanned interventions were required. Main outcome measures Success of primary management and frequency of unplanned interventions. Results A high rate of success (82%) was demonstrated for all management regimens, with minimal morbidity and no deaths occurring. A high success rate was shown when the primary management regimen was systemic methotrexate or ultrasound‐guided intra‐sac injection (88%). The success rate for primary surgical management was 57%. High success rates were reported for both primary management with ultrasound‐guided injections or in combination with systemic methotrexate (94%) and for primary management with systemic methotrexate alone (81%). Seventy‐five per cent of women managed with minimally invasive surgical approaches avoided the need for more extensive surgery, but required longer follow up and additional interventions. Conclusion Minimally invasive approaches were found to be safe and effective treatment for women desiring to conserve fertility. Ultrasound‐guided intra‐sac injection and laparoscopic ectopic removal procedures aimed at preserving reproductive organs should be included as minimally invasive primary management tools in addition to the well‐recognised option of systemic methotrexate. Tweetable abstract Nontubal ectopics: minimally invasive procedures a safe alternative to surgery in selected cases.