z-logo
Premium
Risk factors for recurrent ectopic pregnancy: a case–control study
Author(s) -
Zhang D,
Shi W,
Li C,
Yuan JJ,
Xia W,
Xue RH,
Sun J,
Zhang J
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/1471-0528.14011
Subject(s) - medicine , ectopic pregnancy , obstetrics , odds ratio , intrauterine device , gynecology , case control study , pregnancy , logistic regression , confounding , miscarriage , risk factor , infertility , condom , retrospective cohort study , family planning , population , genetics , environmental health , syphilis , biology , family medicine , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , research methodology
Objective To study the risk factors for recurrent ectopic pregnancy ( REP ). Design A retrospective case–control study. Setting A university medical centre. Population 554 women with a history of ectopic pregnancy ( EP ) were included. Among them were 181 women with current EP , 184 women with current intrauterine pregnancy ( IUP ) and 189 nonpregnant women (NonP). Methods The three groups were matched at a ratio of 1:1 with respect to current age, age of initial EP and gestational week of initial EP . Socio‐demographic characteristics, reproductive history, gynaecological and surgical history, and experience of contraception were compared among the three groups. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for confounders and calculate adjusted odds ratios ( AOR s). Results The risk of REP increased with history of infertility ( AOR = 3.84, 95% CI 2.16–6.86) in REP women compared with IUP controls. Compared with NonP controls, salpingotomy ( AOR = 3.04, 95% CI 1.21–36.51) for previous EP was a risk factor for REP . Multiparous women were less likely to suffer REP when compared with NonP women ( AOR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.18–0.62) or IUP controls ( AOR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.20–0.62). Current use of an intrauterine device ( IUD ) ( REP versus NonP, AOR = 0.02, 95% CI 0.00–0.08) or condoms ( REP versus NonP, AOR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.07–0.38) significantly reduced the risk of REP compared with those not using any contraception. Similarly, previous use of condoms also prevented REP compared with those with no previous condom use ( REP versus NonP, AOR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.08–0.49; REP versus IUP , AOR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.22–0.71). Conclusions Women with history of infertility or salpingotomy should be alert for the recurrence of EP . Multiparous women are less likely to suffer REP . We propose the use of condoms for effective prevention of REP . Tweetable abstract History of infertility and salpingotomy for last EP are risk factors for recurrent EP .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom