z-logo
Premium
An explained variance‐based genetic risk score associated with gestational diabetes antecedent and with progression to pre‐diabetes and type 2 diabetes: a cohort study
Author(s) -
Cormier H,
Vigneault J,
Garneau V,
Tchernof A,
Vohl MC,
Weisnagel SJ,
Robitaille J
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/1471-0528.12937
Subject(s) - gestational diabetes , medicine , body mass index , diabetes mellitus , type 2 diabetes , cohort , obstetrics , population , gynecology , explained variation , cohort study , pregnancy , endocrinology , gestation , biology , genetics , environmental health , machine learning , computer science
Objective To determine whether an explained‐variance genetic risk score ( GRS ), with 36 single nucleotide polymorphisms ( SNP s) previously associated with type 2 diabetes ( T 2 D ), is also associated with gestational diabetes mellitus ( GDM ), and with the progression to pre‐diabetes and T 2 D among women with prior GDM . Design A cohort study. Setting Clinical investigation unit of L aval U niversity, Q uebec, C anada. Population A cohort of 214 women with prior GDM and 82 controls recruited between 2009 and 2012. Methods Associations between the GRS and GDM . Main outcomes measures GDM and prevalence of pre‐diabetes and T 2 D . Results Women with prior GDM had a higher GRS compared with controls (38.6 ± 3.9, 95% CI 38.1–39.1, versus 37.4 ± 3.2, 95% CI 36.7–38.1; P  < 0.0001). In women with prior GDM , the explained‐variance GRS was higher for pre‐diabetic women compared with women who remained normoglucotolerant at testing (1.21 ± 0.18, 95% CI 1.18–1.23, versus 1.17 ± 0.15, 95% CI 1.13–1.20; P  < 0.0001). Similarly, women with T 2 D had a higher explained‐variance GRS compared with women with prior GDM who remained normoglucotolerant (1.20 ± 0.18, 95% CI 1.14–1.25, versus 1.17 ± 0.17, 95% CI 1.13–1.20; P  < 0.0001). The predictive effects of the explained‐variance GRS , age, and body mass index ( BMI ), or the additive effects of the three variables, were tested for pre‐diabetes and T 2 D . We observed an area under the curve of 0.6269 (95% CI 0.5638–0.6901) for age and BMI , and adding the explained‐variance GRS into the model increased the area to 0.6672 (95% CI 0.6064–0.7281) for the prediction of pre‐diabetes. Conclusions An explained‐variance GRS is associated with both GDM and progression to pre‐diabetes and T 2 D in women with prior GDM .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom