z-logo
Premium
Delivery by caesarean section and childhood cancer: a nationwide follow‐up study in three countries
Author(s) -
Momen NC,
Olsen J,
Gissler M,
Cnattingius S,
Li J
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
bjog: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.157
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1471-0528
pISSN - 1470-0328
DOI - 10.1111/1471-0528.12667
Subject(s) - caesarean section , medicine , hazard ratio , obstetrics , confidence interval , population , cancer , pediatrics , pregnancy , childhood cancer , demography , environmental health , genetics , sociology , biology
Objective To investigate the association between delivery by caesarean section and risk of childhood cancer. Design A population‐based, follow‐up study using register data from three countries. Setting D enmark, S weden and F inland. Population Children born in D enmark (1973–2007), S weden (1973–2006) and F inland (randomly selected sample of 90%, 1987–2007; n  = 7 029 843). Methods Exposure was delivery by caesarean section and the outcome was childhood cancer diagnosis. Follow‐up started from birth and ended at the first of the following dates: cancer diagnosis, death, emigration, day before 15th birthday or end of follow‐up. Cox regression was used to obtain hazard ratios. Main outcome measures Childhood cancer diagnosis. Results A total of 882 907 (12.6%) children were delivered by caesarean section. Of these, 30.3% were elective ( n  = 267 603), 35.9% unplanned ( n  = 316 536) and 33.8% had no information on planning ( n  = 298 768). Altogether, 11 181 children received a cancer diagnosis. No evidence of an increased risk of childhood cancer was found for children born by caesarean section (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.99, 1.11). No association was found for any major type of childhood cancer, or when split by the type of caesarean section (elective/unplanned). Conclusion The evidence does not suggest that caesarean section is a risk factor for the overall risk of childhood cancer and possibly not for subtypes of childhood cancer either.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here