z-logo
Premium
Target Firm Returns: Does the Form of Payment Affect Abnormal Returns?
Author(s) -
Davidson III Wallace N.,
Cheng Louis T.W.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of business finance and accounting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.282
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1468-5957
pISSN - 0306-686X
DOI - 10.1111/1468-5957.00115
Subject(s) - payment , cash , stock (firearms) , bidding , business , monetary economics , shareholder , affect (linguistics) , economics , control (management) , finance , microeconomics , corporate governance , mechanical engineering , linguistics , philosophy , management , engineering
Research indicates that at the time of a takeover announcement, target firm shareholders receiving cash earn larger abnormal returns than those receiving stock. Our work confirms that cash targets receive larger direct payments from bidders and that the size of target firm abnormal returns is related to the relative size of this direct payment. Once we control for the size of the payment, however, we find the target firm abnormal returns to be unrelated to the payment method. Thus the relationship between payment method and target firm abnormal returns is indirect. This finding is important because it casts doubt on the signaling (asymmetric information) hypothesis. That is, cash offers do not seem to be valued by the market as a means of reducing this uncertainty. Something else, such as the tax implication differences between cash and stock offers, drives cash target firms to demand larger payments from bidding firms.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here