Premium
Euthanasia and the Slippery Slope
Author(s) -
Clark Michael
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of applied philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.339
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1468-5930
pISSN - 0264-3758
DOI - 10.1111/1468-5930.00095
Subject(s) - slippery slope , argument (complex analysis) , principle of double effect , value (mathematics) , consequentialism , philosophy , sociology , law , law and economics , epistemology , medicine , political science , mathematics , statistics
Although those with liberal attitudes towards voluntary euthanasia are often castigated as crude consequentialists who give overriding value to social utility, two common arguments against permitting active voluntary euthanasia even in the most desperate of cases, the slippery‐slope argument and the argument that further research into terminal care and pain control will be discouraged, are entirely consequentialist, and to invoke them to justify withholding assistance in these desperate cases is to fail to respect patients as ends in themselves.