Premium
Sustainable Development: The Fallacy of a Normatively‐Neutral Development Paradigm
Author(s) -
Parayil Govindan
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of applied philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.339
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1468-5930
pISSN - 0264-3758
DOI - 10.1111/1468-5930.00085
Subject(s) - injustice , poverty , fallacy , sustainable development , environmental degradation , premise , environmental ethics , ideology , egalitarianism , inequality , economics , sociology , culture of poverty , positive economics , development economics , basic needs , neoclassical economics , economic growth , political science , epistemology , politics , law , ecology , philosophy , mathematical analysis , mathematics , biology
Although the concept of ‘sustainable development’ or SD has been welcomed as a new idea to resolve the immense environmental and developmental problems in the world, it has become apparent that the concept has nothing new to offer to the victims of environmental degradation and poverty. The sustainable development thesis, as it is being promoted now, is based on the premise that environmental problems and poverty can be attenuated and eventually solved by being treated as mere technical problems which then can be ultimately reduced to an environmental management problem. As long as the developmentalist ideology of mere economic growth, which is framed within neoclassical economics, is not challenged and transformed, SD cannot address the problems of environmental degradation and poverty. SD needs to be framed in an alternative discourse for analysing the ecological crisis in order to address the issues of economic injustice and inequality. It will be argued that reducing economic inequality and social injustice, which are the underlying causes for ecological injustice, will render environmental problems more tractable and eventually avoidable.