Premium
Roles of causation and meaning for interpreting correlations
Author(s) -
Atmanspacher Harald
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of analytical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.285
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1468-5922
pISSN - 0021-8774
DOI - 10.1111/1468-5922.12086
Subject(s) - synchronicity , causation , interpretation (philosophy) , meaning (existential) , epistemology , pauli exclusion principle , psychology , causality (physics) , philosophy , linguistics , physics , quantum mechanics , condensed matter physics
The essays by Tougas and Willeford address, among other things, a number of ways to understand causation, which play crucial roles in the framework of thinking proposed by Pauli and Jung. The intention of my following reply is to say a few words about how these options are related to one another within our reconstruction of the Pauli‐Jung conjecture. In the tradition of the sciences, looking for causation has become a virtually innate reflex to interpret empirically observed correlations. The concept of synchronicity suggests looking for meaningful coincidences as an alternative, complementary interpretation, particularly appropriate for psychophysical correlations.