Premium
William James’ Theory of Emotions: Filling in the Picture
Author(s) -
Barbalet J. M.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal for the theory of social behaviour
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.615
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1468-5914
pISSN - 0021-8308
DOI - 10.1111/1468-5914.00101
Subject(s) - nothing , criticism , psychology , subject (documents) , epistemology , function (biology) , cognition , cognitive psychology , psychoanalysis , social psychology , philosophy , literature , art , evolutionary biology , neuroscience , library science , computer science , biology
The theory of emotion developed by William James has been subject to four criticisms. First, it is held that Jamesian emotion is without function, that it plays no role in cognition and behavior. Second, that James ignores the role of experience in emotion. Third, that James overstated the role of physical processes in emotion. Fourth, that James’ theory of emotion has been experimentally demonstrated to be false. A fifth point, less an explicit criticism than an assumption, holds that James has nothing to offer a social psychology of emotions. It will be shown in this paper that not one of these criticisms of James' theory of emotion can be sustianed.