Premium
Report on the Workshop on Practical Protection in Humanitarian Crises
Author(s) -
Moller Elizabeth,
Fagen Patricia Weiss,
Martin Susan
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
international migration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.681
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1468-2435
pISSN - 0020-7985
DOI - 10.1111/1468-2435.00225
Subject(s) - refugee , scrutiny , mandate , political science , context (archaeology) , work (physics) , internally displaced person , humanitarian aid , public administration , economic growth , law , economics , engineering , mechanical engineering , paleontology , biology
With a global crisis of approximately 15 million refugees and an estimated 20 to 25 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) in need of protection, the current protection regime is under increased scrutiny. “Practical Protection” is a fairly new concept. Those pursuing it aim to expand understanding and responsibilities for protection beyond those institutions with a specific protection mandate. “The Workshop on Practical Protection in Humanitarian Crises” was organized to bring the practical protection concept to representatives from a wide range of international agencies, governmental agencies and non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), who discussed its implications for their work in humanitarian crises. Organizations with specific protection mandates, primarily the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Committee for the Red Cross (ICRC), work to protect uprooted groups through legal tools and recognized principles, often in the context of assistance programmes that provide shelter, food, water, medical care, education and other forms of humanitarian assistance. They work in collaboration with NGOs and other international organizations that focus primarily on assisting forced migrants. These latter agencies have traditionally avoided overt involvement in protection activities. When UNHCR and ICRC are not present or are over‐extended, gaps in the protection regime emerge. The gap is particularly evident with regard to internally displaced and other war‐affected populations, but it is present in most refugee situations as well.