Was there a B ritish G eorgian town? A comparison between selected S cottish burghs and E nglish towns
Author(s) -
McKean Charles
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
historical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.203
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1468-2281
pISSN - 0950-3471
DOI - 10.1111/1468-2281.12013
Subject(s) - georgian , historiography , scots , scottish enlightenment , context (archaeology) , urban history , urbanism , period (music) , poor relief , commonwealth , enlightenment , history , town planning , eleventh , town council , public administration , economic history , political science , law , urban planning , archaeology , civil engineering , art , engineering , poverty , aesthetics , philosophy , linguistics , literature , theology , acoustics , physics , architecture
This article examines the nature of S cottish urban ambition during the Enlightenment period, through assessing the pattern of public building construction in selected burghs against the general historiography of G eorgian towns. Using principally S cottish burgh council minutes and contemporary publications, it studies the improvement agenda as the context for civic building, and questions whether it provided a discernible process and chronology for the construction activity. In reviewing the symbolic role of public buildings in particular, the article ponders whether there was indeed a B ritish urban experience toward the end of the first century of parliamentary union. [1] It concludes that both in the historically different S cottish urbanism and the distinctive manner in which S cots burghs responded to improvement, the urban experience north and south of the border was significantly different.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom