Premium
Governance and Decision–making in Smaller Colleges
Author(s) -
McNay Ian
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
higher education quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.976
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1468-2273
pISSN - 0951-5224
DOI - 10.1111/1468-2273.00220
Subject(s) - corporate governance , institution , strengths and weaknesses , public relations , higher education , character (mathematics) , political science , sociology , public administration , management , psychology , economics , social science , social psychology , law , geometry , mathematics
A small pilot project suggests that the governance of smaller colleges differs significantly from that of large universities, including the former polytechnics which were incorporated at the same time. The differences do not only relate to size, even though small size allows greater contact between governors and academic activities in their role in relation to ‘the general educational character’ of an institution. Small size also creates possibilities of a ‘drift’ to a greater role for governors in management rather than governance, and key issues emerge of role boundaries and relationships with staff. Smaller colleges have other factors affecting governance. Some have particular specialisms – music, art, land–based industries and so on – with their own cultures, shifting employment contexts, and considerable overlap between professionals inside and outside the colleges. The history of some as church colleges also continues to have influence. In general, their size allows a more ‘familial’ climate in decision–making, but that, too, has strengths and weaknesses.