Premium
The Dearing Report and the Maintenance of Academic Standards: Towards a New Academic Corporatism
Author(s) -
Tapper E.R.,
Salter B.G.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
higher education quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.976
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1468-2273
pISSN - 0951-5224
DOI - 10.1111/1468-2273.00080
Subject(s) - statism , corporatism , higher education , academic freedom , autonomy , managerialism , curriculum , quality (philosophy) , agency (philosophy) , public administration , state (computer science) , political science , quality assurance , public relations , sociology , business , law , social science , marketing , philosophy , epistemology , algorithm , politics , computer science , service (business)
The Dearing Report has given the responsibility for maintaining standards and quality in British higher education to the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). While this quango may be able to ensure ‘threshold’ standards, it is more doubtful whether it can help institutions to sustain high academic quality. Nonetheless, the Report has three potentially very significant consequences: it represents another move towards the creation of a national curriculum in higher education, it offers a more restrictive interpretation of university autonomy, and – despite its protestations – represents a threat to the growing diversity of British higher education. The thrust of the article is that the Report has charted an uneasy ‘middle way’between market forces and statism in the quest for quality control in higher education. It remains to be seen whether the academic corporatism represented by the QAA can resist the pressures of the state and the market.