Premium
Irreconcilable Differences? The Business of Social Research and Users
Author(s) -
Rappert Brian
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
higher education quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.976
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1468-2273
pISSN - 0951-5224
DOI - 10.1111/1468-2273.00042
Subject(s) - restructuring , relevance (law) , government (linguistics) , quality (philosophy) , key (lock) , public relations , sociology , natural (archaeology) , political science , business , epistemology , computer science , philosophy , linguistics , computer security , archaeology , law , history
Research in universities has undergone significant restructuring in the last decade and a half. Much of this restructuring stems from government policies aimed at harnessing research towards the goals of national wealth creation and improved quality of life. A key strategy in achieving these goals is making research relevant to ‘users’, typically defined in terms of business. Although many have commented on the tensions that arise from incorporating the notions of users and relevance in the natural and physical sciences, these have received little attention as they apply to the social sciences. As this paper argues, the application of the notion of users is far from unproblematic and reflects the wider ambiguities of UK science policy in general.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom