Premium
Fog in the Gateway: Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc
Author(s) -
Crampin Joseph
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the modern law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.37
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1468-2230
pISSN - 0026-7961
DOI - 10.1111/1468-2230.12402
Subject(s) - jurisdiction , supreme court , law , interpretation (philosophy) , expansive , paragraph , political science , gateway (web page) , tort , meaning (existential) , legislature , economic justice , divergence (linguistics) , dissenting opinion , scope (computer science) , law and economics , sociology , computer science , philosophy , epistemology , liability , compressive strength , materials science , linguistics , world wide web , composite material , programming language
In Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc , the UK Supreme Court for the first time addressed the meaning of ‘damage’ in the gateway for jurisdiction in tort cases under paragraph 3.1(9)(a) of Practice Direction 6B of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998. The issue has proven controversial with a number of first instance decisions asserting an expansive jurisdiction in such cases, departing from the traditional approach. In the event the Court decided the case on other grounds, but the extensive discussion of the issue (on which the Court was divided 3‐2) illustrates the stark divergence of opinion on the proper scope of and approach to the English courts’ adjudicatory authority. This note criticises the views advanced by the majority for endorsing the more expansive interpretation on the grounds that it fails to take account of the legislative history and applies an incomplete conception of justice in justifying its position.