z-logo
Premium
Legal Basis and Scope of the Human Rights Clauses in EC Bilateral Agreements: Any Room for Positive Interpretation?
Author(s) -
Fierro Elena
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
european law journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.351
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1468-0386
pISSN - 1351-5993
DOI - 10.1111/1468-0386.00118
Subject(s) - human rights , interpretation (philosophy) , scope (computer science) , law , convention , law and economics , virtue , promotion (chess) , ideal (ethics) , fundamental rights , political science , democracy , function (biology) , sociology , politics , linguistics , philosophy , computer science , evolutionary biology , biology , programming language
It is well known nowadays that the European Community includes a so‐called human rights clause into the framework agreements that it concludes with third countries. It is also widely recognised that, in virtue of the relevant provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties, such a clause grants the Community a right to suspend the agreement should human rights and/or democratic principles be breached. The question to be explored in the present paper is whether, in the light of its legal basis, the clause fulfils a mere ‘negative’ or ‘sanctioning’ function or, by contrast, there is room for the pursuit of positive measures of active promotion of human rights—that is the granting of technical and financial aid. It is argued here that the clauses present an ideal starting point for the pursuit of a comprehensive human rights policy at the EU level. Such a policy should encompass positive measures in the first place, systematic dialogue in the second, and suspension or negative measures of less extent only as ultima ratio in particularly grave cases which cannot be addressed through ordinary (dialogue and aid) routes.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here