Premium
The Road to Hell: Intentions and Propositional Attitude Ascription
Author(s) -
Saul Jennifer M.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
mind and language
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.905
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1468-0017
pISSN - 0268-1064
DOI - 10.1111/1468-0017.00116
Subject(s) - variation (astronomy) , ascription , counterintuitive , epistemology , truth condition , context (archaeology) , psychology , cognitive psychology , computer science , philosophy , paleontology , physics , astrophysics , biology
Accounts of propositional attitude reporting which invoke contextual variation in semantic content have become increasingly popular, with good reason: our intuitions about the truth conditions of such reports vary with context. This paper poses a problem for such accounts, arguing that any reasonable candidate source for this contextual variation will yield very counterintuitive results. The accounts, then, cannot achieve their goal of accommodating our truth conditional intuitions. This leaves us with a serious puzzle. Theorists must either give up on the goal of agreement with our truth conditional intuitions, or find a different source for contextual variation.