Premium
Stoicism, Evil, and the Possibility of Morality
Author(s) -
Card Claudia
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
metaphilosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.475
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 1467-9973
pISSN - 0026-1068
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9973.00096
Subject(s) - morality , epistemology , philosophy , argument (complex analysis) , stoicism , normative ethics , environmental ethics , value (mathematics) , deontological ethics , luck , sociology , chemistry , biochemistry , machine learning , computer science
Martha Nussbaum's work has been characterized by a sustained critique of Stoic ethics, insofar as that ethics denies the validity and importance of our valuing things that elude our control. This essay explores the idea that the very possibility of morality, understood as social or interpersonal ethics, presupposes that we do value such things. If my argument is right, Stoic ethics is unable to recognize the validity of morality (so understood) but can at most acknowledge duties to oneself. A further implication is that moral luck, so far from undermining morality as some have held, is presupposed by the very possibility of morality.