Premium
Implementation Between Tradition and Management: Structuration and Styles of Implementation
Author(s) -
Terpstra Jan,
Havinga Tetty
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
law and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.534
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1467-9930
pISSN - 0265-8240
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9930.00104
Subject(s) - structuration theory , bureaucracy , context (archaeology) , style (visual arts) , perspective (graphical) , management styles , relation (database) , process (computing) , sociology , welfare state , public administration , public relations , political science , social science , computer science , politics , history , paleontology , archaeology , database , artificial intelligence , law , biology , operating system
This article presents a diachronic perspective for implementation research. It analyzes implementation practices in relation to their changing institutional context. Therefore, a comparison is made between different styles of implementation. The relationship between implementation practices and institutional context is analyzed as a structuration process, following Giddens’s theory. Four styles of policy implementation are distinguished: a traditional, bureaucratic, professional, and managerial style. These four styles are connected with different phases in the development of the welfare state. This developmental model is illustrated with an analysis of policy implementation in Dutch public assistance between 1950 and the early 1990s.