z-logo
Premium
Clear Choices and Guesswork in Peremptory Challenges in Federal Criminal Trials
Author(s) -
Finkelstein Michael O.,
Levin Bruce
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of the royal statistical society: series a (statistics in society)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.103
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1467-985X
pISSN - 0964-1998
DOI - 10.1111/1467-985x.00062
Subject(s) - relevance (law) , psychology , criminology , political science , computer science , law
The traditional practice of permitting lawyers to strike jurors by peremptory challenge is being subjected to new questioning in the USA. Previous studies of strikes have used simulations or questionnaires, raising doubt about their relevance in actual trials. In this paper we report on a study that uses actual trial data and a mathematical model to estimate the extent to which the lawyers’ selections are clear choices on which all lawyers would agree or are guesswork involving essentially random choices. The results are that only a small proportion of the challenges are clear choices, a conclusion that is consistent with the findings of simulation studies.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here