Premium
On Space As A Capacity
Author(s) -
CORSÍNJIMÉNEZ ALBERTO
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of the royal anthropological institute
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.62
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1467-9655
pISSN - 1359-0987
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9655.t01-1-00008
Subject(s) - meaning (existential) , agency (philosophy) , space (punctuation) , argument (complex analysis) , sociology , ethnography , social space , structure and agency , construct (python library) , epistemology , value (mathematics) , social psychology , aesthetics , social science , psychology , computer science , linguistics , anthropology , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , machine learning , programming language
This article is about space and social relationships. More precisely, it is about the space of and in social relationships. It is also about the efficacy of social relationships in segregating their own contexts of meaning and value. The article also addresses the question of how agency comes about. This ‘coming about’ of agency, its swelling and appearance in a structure of meaning, is what I call ‘capacity’. Social relationships have ‘capacity’. That is, they have both spaciousness and potency. They accomplish things, and accomplish things ‘somewhere’. In this respect, space (or the capacity of social relationships) is something very different from idioms that we have come to think of as forms of space, like landscape or place. This article is also, therefore, a critique of the way in which some anthropologists have recently theorized landscape and place. My argument is based on an ethnographic account of the dimensions through which people construct urban space in the Chilean city of Antofagasta.