z-logo
Premium
Outputs: the promises and perils of ethnographic engagement after the loss of faith in transnational dialogue
Author(s) -
Riles Annelise
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of the royal anthropological institute
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.62
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1467-9655
pISSN - 1359-0987
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9655.12602
Subject(s) - ethnography , faith , bureaucracy , theme (computing) , sociology , knowledge production , meridian (astronomy) , public relations , political science , environmental ethics , epistemology , law , anthropology , knowledge management , politics , philosophy , physics , astronomy , computer science , operating system
This essay investigates one important artefact of meeting knowledge production: outputs. It does so through the example of the activities of the members of Meridian 180, a community of Pacific Rim intellectuals collaborating on transnational legal and policy issues. For the members, the particular kind of knowledge production facilitated by Meridian 180 constitutes a response to the failures of international bureaucracy to generate and sustain a fabric of global relationality. The group's various attempts to address the imperative for ‘output’ illuminate both aspects of the meeting as an organizational form, and the challenges and opportunities meetings present for ethnography. The wider underlying theme of the essay concerns the ethical purposes and promises of ethnographic styles of engagement after the loss of faith in transnational dialogue.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here