z-logo
Premium
Nominative Subjects and Pro‐Drop INFL
Author(s) -
Torrego Esther
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
syntax
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.587
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1467-9612
pISSN - 1368-0005
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9612.00008
Subject(s) - nominative case , linguistics , catalan , computer science , feature (linguistics) , agreement , mathematics , arithmetic , combinatorics , verb , philosophy
In this article I discuss pro and its licensing strategies. I argue that the D‐feature postulated by Chomsky (1995) for Tense and v can be realized in a separate head, namely, on a D, which then licenses pro (along the lines of Torrego (1998)). Focusing on nominative subjects in certain infinitival clauses of Catalan, Italian, and Spanish, I propose that their nominative subjects are licensed by a D with “weak” agreement features in association with Tense. Expletive pro and argumental pro are discussed and it is proposed that the D that licenses the former has no agreement features, whereas the D that licenses the latter has “rich” agreement. A parallel is established between the licensing strategy of “clitic‐doubling” and the licensing of argumental pro in infinitival clauses.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here