Premium
Inclusive education in A ustralia: rhetoric, reality and the road ahead
Author(s) -
Anderson Joanna,
Boyle Christopher
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
support for learning
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.25
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1467-9604
pISSN - 0268-2141
DOI - 10.1111/1467-9604.12074
Subject(s) - meaning (existential) , legislature , population , public relations , rhetoric , political science , state (computer science) , inclusion (mineral) , pedagogy , sociology , medical education , psychology , public administration , medicine , social science , law , algorithm , computer science , linguistics , philosophy , demography , psychotherapist
Inclusive education ( IE ) is a term that has been part of the educational discourse in A ustralia for almost two decades. While there is no overarching definition under which IE operates in that country, it is accepted that the meaning behind the term has shifted from being exclusively about students with a disability to now encompassing the delivery of a high‐quality education to all students. The public education system is carrying the burden of an increasingly diverse student population ( G onski et al ., 2011), and as such, each of the eight educational jurisdictions responsible for the schools within their borders have developed policies and increased funding levels in the name of IE ( G raham, in press). Despite this, there are currently no standards or guidelines provided at the state or federal level to measure the success (or not) of IE practices within A ustralian educational sectors. This article aims to do just that, by providing a ‘report card’ on IE in A ustralia. An extensive review of the current literature and related educational policies and reports was conducted, and L oreman's (2014) three guides for measuring IE – student participation, student achievement and post‐school options – were adopted to evaluate the performance of A ustralia's public education system. The findings indicate that, despite operating under the same national legislative acts, the eight educational jurisdictions in A ustralia are managing and enacting IE in different ways, leading to inconsistent levels of access and educational outcomes for students. Rates of segregation and exclusion (through both the provision of education in ‘alternative’ settings and disciplinary action) are on the increase, with disproportionate representation of students from minority groups. This has been exacerbated by the inception of a national testing regime, which some have argued is in breach of the Disability Discrimination Act as it excludes participation by particular groups of students. On the flip side, for the first time A ustralia has a consistent curriculum that has provided a set of outcomes for all students, and the gap between Indigenous and non‐Indigenous students in the areas of literacy and numeracy is on the decrease, albeit a slow decrease. However, there is still a long way to go, and this paper discusses the need for a national approach to IE to enable the continued development of effective schooling for all students across A ustralia.